A very happy Steve Gainey!

[Frasson118]

I guess what I really was trying to convey, is that it is not what the "Sportsman" concept was supposed to be. Tht class should be about tuning UP a Monte Carlo or Camaro... not scaling back from a Modified or a Late Model.
Steve Gainey is not the only one either. The whole concept has run away, and hasn't been brought under control yet. If it doesn't (and soon), there will be no more Southern Sportsman Series.

[Benny The Mule]

Have you looked at a FASCAR sportsman lately? Just add wide 5's and you got a stock clip LM.

[Rick Williamson]

I guess what I really was trying to convey, is that it is not what the "Sportsman" concept was supposed to be. Tht class should be about tuning UP a Monte Carlo or Camaro... not scaling back from a Modified or a Late Model.
Steve Gainey is not the only one either. The whole concept has run away, and hasn't been brought under control yet. If it doesn't (and soon), there will be no more Southern Sportsman Series.

It goes back to the officials letting the rules be relaxed the first year. And each year after that allowing more. All in the name of getting bigger car counts. So don't point fingers at drivers. Drivers in Nascar on down to the local 4 cyl bomber class will push the envelope. In the end the buck stops with the owner and the tech people. Oh and if someone is going to play tech. Then they need to bring the tools they need to the race. Not go by the old eye ball to dq cars. Prove it's wrong or right. So that all the drivers know they are getting a fair shake.