Even the readers of this board can agree on one thing: inadequate, biased and unfair tech angers racers and hurts car count. Its been a problem that we've struggled with for generations in our sport.
Recently, there have been concrete steps made to address this situation here in Florida. I am referring to the "Ricky Brooks" approach to tech, which consists of a series of inspections where there is no middle ground, everything is black or white, so do it my way or you are out.
I have not settled on an answer yet, but the question is "have things gone a little too far?" Have we reached the piont where some racers will stay away because of the unrelenting hassle? Could be. Since I don't run a SLM I really don't have a dog in the fight, however I am an interested observer.
You can make a case for both sides. Some of the problems last weekend were cut and dry, like the 51* for example, while others were border-line and subjective. I can't discount the possibility that personalities and egos enter the tech picture. They usually do.
So I am keeping an open mind on this one. The Snowball Derby is coming up and we'll see if there is chaos at that event, or if it runs smoothly. The World Series at NSS will be here before we know it, and I am sure no one wants to see so many DQ's like we had last time.
Do we return to the bad old days of favoritism and selective tech? Continue with the present government style hassle, or maybe find some middle ground?
* The 51 was told several times over two days to change the nose, but they refused. Too bad, the driver put on an excellent show and has a very bright future.
Recently, there have been concrete steps made to address this situation here in Florida. I am referring to the "Ricky Brooks" approach to tech, which consists of a series of inspections where there is no middle ground, everything is black or white, so do it my way or you are out.
I have not settled on an answer yet, but the question is "have things gone a little too far?" Have we reached the piont where some racers will stay away because of the unrelenting hassle? Could be. Since I don't run a SLM I really don't have a dog in the fight, however I am an interested observer.
You can make a case for both sides. Some of the problems last weekend were cut and dry, like the 51* for example, while others were border-line and subjective. I can't discount the possibility that personalities and egos enter the tech picture. They usually do.
So I am keeping an open mind on this one. The Snowball Derby is coming up and we'll see if there is chaos at that event, or if it runs smoothly. The World Series at NSS will be here before we know it, and I am sure no one wants to see so many DQ's like we had last time.
Do we return to the bad old days of favoritism and selective tech? Continue with the present government style hassle, or maybe find some middle ground?
* The 51 was told several times over two days to change the nose, but they refused. Too bad, the driver put on an excellent show and has a very bright future.
Comment