You know what is wrong with FASCAR's point system? It rewards attendance over performance. Using the current distribution of 100 points to win, 98 for second and so forth, it is virtually impossible for a fast car to run down and pass even a very slow competitor as far as the points race is concerned. This is even more pronounced with the small fields that we have often had this year.
Here is an example. Consider two drivers: one of them wins the first 5 races of the season, while the other finishes 9'th in all 5 races. The next week, the winner doesn't show and the other guy finishes 9'th again. Who is leading the points? The guy who finished 9'th for 6 weeks in a row!
Wouldn't it be great to go back to the old system of 40-36-32 etc? That way, a competitive car could actually run down and pass a field filler. I guess the thinking must be to build car count at the back by giving last place nearly the same points as the winner.
Here is an example. Consider two drivers: one of them wins the first 5 races of the season, while the other finishes 9'th in all 5 races. The next week, the winner doesn't show and the other guy finishes 9'th again. Who is leading the points? The guy who finished 9'th for 6 weeks in a row!
Wouldn't it be great to go back to the old system of 40-36-32 etc? That way, a competitive car could actually run down and pass a field filler. I guess the thinking must be to build car count at the back by giving last place nearly the same points as the winner.
Comment